The Tao of Gaming

Glory To Rome -- Two Dimes


OK, I've now played 20 times. I'm still waiting for the 3ed edition (and errata), but I'm coming down on the "it's got game." [And I haven't been playing with the Out of Town rules, discussed earlier]. In my original post I called it an 'ambitious failure.' Well, it's tough to justify that on a game I keep playing as my 30-45 minutes game of choice. After thinking about it a while, I called it a 'clunky success.' It could be cleaner, but it works.

I do think that perhaps the pool should start with an extra card or two (particularly with 5 players). The player who goes last can be in a real bind, and that helps. But I've seen most of the buildings work out well, and poorly. Our groupthink has evolved over the last 6 weeks, which is always a good sign.

I recommend checking this out.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Glory To Rome -- Two Dimes
  2. More Glory to Rome
  3. Glory to Rome -- Thoughts on design
Eddie (mail) (www):
Wow. I would die if I found the time to play a game like this once.
5.29.2007 1:51am
Brian (www):
Glory to Rome only takes 30-45 minutes. Are you thinking of some other game with Rome in the title (plenty of which take 3+ hours)?
5.29.2007 1:02pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?