Chris Farrell has a new post, so back onto the blogroll.
For a minor celebrity, Rich Sommers has pretty good taste in games. On an almost related note, there's the "Brushes with Fame" geeklist.
Time's up gets a deluxe edition. I'm not sold on the "fourth round" (with pantomiming) ... it's a good idea, but difficult. We tried making the 4th round simultaneous. All players on one side close their eyes and the other side poses. That stops any problems with trying to quickly open and close your eyes over 30 seconds. Still didn't quite work.
I do think that the "Titles" (instead of Celebrity names") idea is good, although everyone seems to want to put in a title that is also a name. (I liked "Tom Jones," personally).
I read the three-way discussion with Michael Barnes, Ryan Bretsch, and Eric Martin a few days ago. There was one good point (by Barnes):
That whole “different strokes” approach winds up undermining the whole point of having an opinion, discussing it, and defending it. That’s fine in day-to-day life and that’s how I live in pretty much all respects, but when it comes to opinion-making and criticism that shouldn’t be the de facto defense.
BGG has polls. Now they need to stop having so damn many (A geek-dime fee per poll. You heard it here first).
There ARE bad games. For the life of me, I can't imagine who would enjoy something like Polterdice, which has design flaws galore. But unless you're perched upon a soapbox (and I think that's the key distinction), a foreknowledge that your opinion is not the only one in the gaming universe seems like a very healthy attribute to have.
I don't think such a statement invalidates a review, but it adds bulk without adding content. OTOH, as you point out Larry, explaining why someone might have a different appreciation is fine. The open ended "I did or didn't enjoy it, but others felt differently" doesn't say much though.
Then again, saying "I don't like it but someone else might" is lazy, while "I don't like this, but if you like role-playing elements and pretending to be a pirate, and fighting and treasure-hunting, and don't mind the dice, then this is good for you" is useful to a reader.
Which is what Frunk says above, actually.