"My insights into Fairy Tale strategy are markedly better than random play." OK, it's not that comforting.
Based on feedback, I'm skipping the Neural Network and just going with a correlation matrix (which will eventually evolved). I've hardcoded my default correlation matrix (80 x 40) and initial weighting of cards (1 x 40). [Player #1 is the non-random one].
INFO 9859 - GameState - Player #1 won 82 games. INFO 9859 - GameState - Player #2 won 9 games. INFO 9859 - GameState - Player #3 won 5 games. INFO 9859 - GameState - Player #4 won 8 games. INFO 9859 - GameState - Player #5 won 3 games.
Right now I'm just using a "Play the card you like best each round", but perhaps I should look at the breakpoints ... if I know I won't be playing two of the cards at all, perhaps theirs a way to let it evolve ways of ordering the rest of the card play.
Now I just have to program a mutator, a serializor and a reaper. Then it's off to the evolutionary races! (Eventually I'll need to write a GUI so I can play against it, assuming it gets good enough ...)
I'll write some more bridge in a few days. And some actual game stuff later...
Related Posts (on one page):
- A comforting thought
- Fear my L33t
http://xkcd.com/534/
I think that non-partnership fairy tale is a pretty simple score maximization excercize, once you know the cards. Partnership is much more interesting because you must weigh defensive vs offensive moves.