The Tao of Gaming

Amazing Session -- Round #8


 S:AJ642
 H:AJ9
 D:T753
 C:7
 S:Q985
 H:53
 D:AKJ
 C:JT64
 S:KT83
 H:KQT752
 D:Q94
 C:--
 S:--
 H:64
 D:862
 C:AKQ98532

Both vulnerable. Dealer was west, I made a 3rd seat opener of 1H. South jumped to 3C, passed back to me and I doubled back in, figuring I could stand any suit. Of course, I can't really stand 3 clubs doubled, which floated and made. -670 was a zero. (The top was +790, four hearts doubled making). Bidding 3H would have worked out, but it felt wrong to give up on spades or even diamonds. Perhaps partner should bid 3S ... looking only at my hand (East) I'm still not sure.

In the next hand, I opened 1 diamond with a flat 3-3-4-3 13 count, and got to play it.

 S:AKQ2
 H:T84
 D:Q96
 C:T63
 S:JT976
 H:765
 D:J82
 C:95
 S:543
 H:J32
 D:AK43
 C:KQ4
 S:8
 H:AKQ9
 D:T75
 C:AJ872

Three tables played in 1 diamond, off three. Getting to game isn't easy at all. I must admit, I'd be very tempted as South to overcall 1 Heart (for the lead direction value), or for north to balance 1 spade. Solid four card suits are biddable. North could also double, which is more flexible...

One poor pair had west make a weak jump shift into spades, and now N-S suddenly know what to do — take the money. Anyway, even among the N/S that bid, most missed their game, although one pair wound up in 4 Hearts (which made five...west must have led a spade). A touch over 4.5 match points.

The last hand was a relatively flat 3N.

Update: Fixed first hand ...

JeffG (www):
"Perhaps partner should bid 3S?" You are being overly kind. Passing 3Cx is total foolishness.

On the next hand, I would not have passed 1D with any of the other three hands, though I can understand your partner's passing with the 2-count. I admit that I would pass vul against not, but otherwise, I'd try to steal.
5.9.2009 10:32am
Michael (mail):
You seem to have replaced the AKJ of diamonds with 765 of diamonds somewhere in the hand.
5.9.2009 1:09pm
Lou (mail):
Right, it looks like west, in the first hand, should have AJ of diamonds, which reinforces that 3S was the right bid amd would have led you to 4H.
5.9.2009 3:10pm
Brian (www):
Fixed first hand...
5.10.2009 6:41pm
JeffG (www):
With the DAKJ, West has an obvious negative double of 3C. East has a easy 4S bid. 4S can be made despite the Hawaiian trump split, but might not be unless North doubles (or obviously considers doubling). And passing 3Cx is still terrible---it's shooting for +200 when +620 looks easy (though it turns out not to be).
5.11.2009 8:40am
Larry Levy (mail):
"Hawaiian trump split" - LOL!
5.11.2009 10:17am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?